Mining the diatom genome for the mechanism of biosilicification.

E ver since the invention of the microscope, scientists and laypeople alike have marveled at the intricate patterning of the silica within the diatom cell wall, termed the frustule (Fig. 1). There are well over 10,000 species of diatoms in marine and freshwaters, and each species has a unique wall morphology (1). Although organisms from multiple kingdoms of life produce siliceous structures (e.g., phytoliths in higher plants, spicules in sponges, frustules in diatom), those produced by diatoms are the most ornate and the most finely detailed. The ability of diatoms to manipulate silicon at the nanoscale exceeds that of human nanotechnology, making the genetic and biochemical underpinnings of biosilicification of great interest in material science. Diatoms are also important ecologically because they are major primary producers supporting the food webs in both marine and fresh waters. Despite the broad scientific interest in the silicification process, the biochemical pathways involved and the underlying genetics are largely a mystery. The sequencing of the first diatom genome (2) has enabled a new suite of approaches in the hunt for pathways involved in biosilicification. In this issue of PNAS, Mock et al. (3) exploit this potential by using whole genome expression profiling to elucidate candidate genes controlling silicification in the marine diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. Diatoms are microscopic unicellular protists and the vast majority are photoautotrophs. Their role in the ecology and biogeochemistry of our planet is impressive. They are responsible for 20% of the carbon fixed through photosynthesis on Earth (4), making diatoms major contributors to global carbon cycling and they collectively produce 10 km3 of hydrated amorphous silica each year (5). Diatoms are the only major group of phytoplankton that require silicon. Dissolved silicic acid concentrations in the surface ocean are often inadequate to meet the demand of the diatoms (6, 7), making knowledge of diatom silicification important for understanding the mechanisms governing the contribution of diatoms to ecological and biogeochemical processes. Diatoms dominate the biogeochemical cycling of silicon through the sea. Each atom of silicon entering the oceans from weathering is incorporated into the cell wall of a diatom and dissolved back into the sea an average of 40 times before being buried in the sea bed (8). The slow burial of diatoms in the sea bed over geologic time has produced a significant fraction of the world’s petroleum, and diatom deposits that have been uplifted onto the land are mined worldwide as a source of diatomaceous earth, which is used as a filtration medium and in the manufacturing of explosives and other products. The diatom cell wall is mulipartate consisting of two valves with interconnecting segments called girdle bands. Each component of the frustule is formed in a tightly timed sequence within the cell cycle (9, 10). In the case of T. pseudonana, its girdle bands are formed sequentially at a nearly constant rate during G1, silicification ceases in S phase, and valves are deposited in late in the cell cycle G2 and M (10). The process of biosilicification in diatoms begins with the active transport of dissolved silicic acid from the aqueous environment into the cell mediated by silicon transporters, or SITS, whose expression and activity also show tight regulation during the cell cycle (11, 12). Intracellular concentrations of dissolved silicon exceed the solubility of silicic acid (13), suggesting the presence of an organic silicon complex that may maintain silicon in solution and shepherd it to the silicon deposition vesicle (SDV). Silicon enters the SDV and is deposited as amorphous hydrated silica under precise genetic control to form the ornate patterns of the frustule (14). The process of frustule morphogenesis has been studied in great detail since the advent of the electron microscope, but the molecular underpinnings of the process are only now being discovered. Our knowledge of the molecular basis of biosilicification in diatoms stems mainly from analysis of proteins isolated from the mature diatom cell wall. Several key molecules involved in silicon processes have been discovered by using this approach, including silicon transporters (11, 12) and proteins, named silaffins, which together with polyamines are able to produce silica nanospheres in vitro that bear a strong resemblance to those formed during frustule formation in vivo in some species (15, 16). Mock et al.’s (3) approach is different in that they attempt to identify all genes involved in the silicification process within the diatom genome. This poses a great challenge, because there is little homology among the proteins involved in silicification from different taxa, thwarting efforts to identify genes involved in biosilicificiation through in silico homology-based approaches. To circumvent this issue, they first employ whole genome tiling array-based expression profiling to identify novel genes. More than 34,470 transcriptional units not predicted by gene models were identified, suggesting that the T. pseudonana genome contains 30% more genes than previously thought (2). To examine which of these gene products may be involved in silicification pathways, the authors constructed impressively comprehensive gene expression arrays that included probes to all in silico predicted genes, all available EST sequences, the newly discovered unpredicted transcriptional units, as well as 16,000 additional tiling array probe clusters. To target silicon-related genes, Mock et al. (3) looked for differences in the hybridization of RNA isolated from silicon-